Showing posts with label solar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solar. Show all posts

Three Bright New Ideas in Biofuels, Solar and Wind Power

>> Thursday, January 21, 2010

The cleantech industry is a constant source of new ideas, for generating energy and for saving it. Many (or most) of these ideas never go anywhere, though. I try to pick out the ones that seem most likely to succeed; the easiest way to do so is look out for new venture capital fundings and pilot projects.


January is proving an especially fertile month, at least for announcements. The three latest companies that look interesting are split across three sectors: FloDesign Wind makes a new type of wind turbine, Joule Biotechnologies is a biofuel startup, andSolar Fusion Power, as you will have guessed, generates solar power with an unusual design.


I’ve split the three up below to give more detail on each; if that’s not enough, the links in each section have even more.



FloDesign Wind
FloDesign hasn’t been in hiding; the company previously won a technology competition at theMassachusetts Institute of Technology for its alternate wind turbine design, which departs from the traditional “prop” design of a wind turbine with something that looks a lot more like a jet engine.



The short explanation of how it works is that air going through the turbine’s rotor and over its cowl joins to cause a “pulling” effect on the air behind it, spinning the blades more quickly than they would otherwise move. The resulting design is a bit odd-looking, as you can see at right, but the basic idea is well proven. Pop over to Youtube to watch FloDesign’s video on their technology.



But there are quite a few variations on the prop design, most of which turn out to be less practical based on factors like the amount of material or wind speed required for their use. How to pick through the pile? Unless you’re an expert in gas flow dynamics, it’s difficult to make objective measurements.



That’s a long-winded way of saying that FloDesign should get some attention, because some folks with fairly good judgment are busy throwing money its way. FloDesign won a $8.3 million grant from the the Department of Energy’s ARPA-E program, and more recently, announced a $34.5 million investment from Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, a Silicon Valley venture firm with a sterling reputation.



Joule Biotechnologies
This one won’t sound too odd at first. Joule plans on putting a microorganism in a pool with nutrients, focusing sunlight on it, and harvesting the resulting oil to use as fuel. Not much different from a greenhouse or plant solarium, right?



It is odd, though, in part because the microorganism isn’t one provided by nature; Joule says it’s a designer product. The sunlight it’s receiving is also more than the usual dosage, having been concentrated by the enclosing panels in each modular unit. Want more fuel? Just add more units.



Algal biofuel producers haven’t had much luck with enclosed systems; they tend to be too expensive. But if Joule can up the output of the system by concentrating sunlight, it might prove efficient enough to survive. It’s planning to build a pilot plant in Texas that will start operating within a few months.



Solar Fusion Power
It has nothing to do with actual fusion, but at least the name is catchy. Solar Fusion Power is a variation, several steps removed, on the now-familiar concept of solar thermal energy, which focuses sunlight with mirrors onto enclosed water, which boils and drives a generator.



One of the advantages of solar thermal, beyond its low cost per watt of energy produced, is the simplicity of most systems. That could be the point on which Solar Fusion falls short. The company’s design centers around a “flower” with mirrored petals. The petals bounce sunlight up onto a central lens. This is not small, delicate machine, by the way; a single unit would cover 50 square meters.



After this double-bounce, the sunlight enters an enclosed chamber full of (extremely hot) liquid calcium. The light raises the temperature enough that the calcium can fuse with a stream of hydrogen, which produces energy. Later, the calcium will let go of the hydrogen molecule, producing more energy and allowing the reaction to be repeated. The result: 50 percent of the initial sunlight’s energy is captured, more than just about any solar system can use.



Still, to my ear, this all sounds a bit too convoluted to work well, or cheaply. But an Australian company called EMC Solar has invested, and the company plans to run a pilot project in Perth, so it’s worth keeping an eye on.


Source : http://bit.ly/8EgFLD

Read more...

Solar Powered Skins for iPhones and iPod Touch

>> Monday, January 11, 2010

iphone solar skin
Image via NovoThink


It looks like Apple gadget users will have a new way to charge up iPods and iPhone devices with the sun, thanks to the latest from NovoThink. The company has released the Solar Surge, a skin with an integrated solar cell capable of charging the Apple devices on 100% solar power.


As for charging capabilities, the company states that 2 hours of direct solar exposure provides about 30 minutes of talk time on a 3G network or 60 minutes of talk time on a 2G network, and the skin's battery stores 120% capacity of iPhone 3G.

solar iphone skin

It also comes with a Solar Planner application that helps you assess what your solar needs are to fully charge up your gadget, so you eliminate the guessing for how many hours of daylight you need to get full bars.


One more handy way to get your gadgets off grid - or at least it will be. It isn't quite on the market yet. But at the end of this month, you'll be able to pick it up for $70. A little pricey, yes, but not too bad for a solar charger made specifically to fit and protect as well as power your device.


Read more...

CES 2010: iPhone & iPod Everywhere

solar phone charger photo


One of our very popular posts from this fall was news about solar powered skins for iPhones and iPod Touch products. And when I say popular, I mean REALLY popular. It's clear this is the kind of thing readers can get excited about. But at CES, it was also clear that it's not just TreeHugger readers who get excited about it - everyone does. Solar powered chargers capable of charging Apple devices are already around, but coming up are more solar powered skins, like this one from eVogue.


solar phone charger photo


Capable of providing a 5 Volt charge, it reportedly can charge up in just 3 hours of sunlight. On the same information card stating this, it also states that the solar cell is just 0.61 Watts. So in other words, nuh uh. Or rather, it might be able to charge its own battery in that amount of time, but when transferring the power to an iPhone battery, it can likely only provide a few minutes of talk time.


As solar power for gadgets continues to increase in popularity, consumers will be able to look at devices and weed out those that are just solar junk - like this one seems to be. However, also at the booth was another device that shows solar power is gaining in popularity - a charger with a pop-out mini USB port.

solar phone charger photo


I heard from several companies at CES that alternative charging for mini and micro USB products is in more demand, and this slick-looking charger shows it.


There is a problem, though, and that is (as it has been for the last couple years) a rush of inferior chargers onto the market, a lack of highly efficient yet small solar charging options, and a consumer base that is still somewhat uneducated about what solar chargers can and can't do for them. These small devices can give you emergency backup power, or a full charge if you're willing to wait for it, but it can't give you a full charge every day, as many people seem to expect - and as all of us want.


So these phone skins and mini chargers are getting popular, but for power hungry iPhones, they aren't able to perform the way many consumers may think they should. We'll see how far they actually can go in the market among consumers who want more than they're getting.

Source : http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/01/ces-2010-solar-powered-iphone-skins-getting-more-popular.php

Read more...

Solar Water Heaters Mandatory in Hawaii

>> Wednesday, January 6, 2010

As of January 1, 2010, building permits on all single-family new home construction in Hawaii may not be issued for homes that do not include a solar water heating system. This legislation, SB644, was enacted in June of 2009; however, the state energy resources coordinator may be able to provide a variance for this requirement if:



  • Installation is impracticable due to poor solar resource;

  • Installation is cost-prohibitive based upon a life cycle cost-benefit analysis that incorporates the average residential utility bill and the cost of the new solar water heating system with a life cycle that does not exceed 15 years;

  • A renewable energy technology system is substituted for use as the primary energy source for heating water; or

  • A demand water heater device approved by UL is installed; provided that at least one other gas appliance is installed in the dwelling. (A "demand water heater" means a gas-tankless instantaneous water heater that provides hot water only as it is needed.)

While the legislation is already in effect, the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission must still adopt specifications for the required performance, materials, components, durability, longevity, proper sizing, installation and quality of solar water heaters.



Already, even before the impact of this new legislation is felt, there are over 65,000 solar water heaters in use in Hawaii today, including thousands on the Big Island. In fact, Hawaii ranks number one in the nation when it comes to using energy from the sun to heat water.



With an eye toward the future, Hawaii law makers understand that conventional water heaters are typically the largest electricity consumer in the average household, gobbling up nearly 40% of consumption. Hawaii's move to force solar heating is a big step for a state that relies heavily on imported fossil fuels for 90% of its supply. This bill has been a long time coming - when the legislation was first introduced five years ago, a barrel of oil cost just $40. Since then, the price has more than tripled.



Overall, solar water heating may save about $6 to $12 or more per person per month when replacing a standard electric resistance water heater. The savings, of course, will vary by household based in part on each person's hot water usage.



Using solar water heating can help keep electric rates down by also reducing electricity demand during the peak evening times from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. when people often use hot water for washing dishes, taking showers, and so forth. To meet this evening peak demand, less efficient electricity generation units must be brought on-line by the power companies. These less efficient units cost more to run and this increase in cost is passed on to consumers.



Not surprisingly, builders and developers were against the new bill, saying it would add too much to the cost of new home constructions. Another surprising opponent was the Hawaii Solar Energy Association. Ron Richmond, with the association, said in an interview with the Star Bulletin, the new legislation would cost home buyers about $2,100 more to have the solar water heaters installed. The average solar water heater, according to the article, currently costs about $5,250, before rebates.



The length of time required to recoup your original investment (payback) will vary widely and depend on whether the purchase is paid for outright or financed and how much energy (electricity, gas, etc.) is saved. Simple payback is the length of time required to recover your investment through reduced or avoided costs. You can expect a shorter payback in areas that have higher energy costs, where the family uses a moderate to large amount of hot water per person, and for homes with more occupants. Finance charges will also lengthen the payback period.



While this new program may make some new homeowners balk at first, there are additional benefits when the cost of a solar water heating system is included in the mortgage for a home purchase. The interest rates are usually lower than on a short-term loan. In addition, the small additional increase in the monthly mortgage payment may be more than made up for in reduced energy costs (electricity or gas).



In the short run, those purchasing new homes in Hawaii may feel a pinch in their wallet upfront in having to install a solar hot water heater; however, over a short period of time, these new homeowners will easily recoup their investment. And, more importantly, by diversifying the State of Hawaii's mix of energy resources by using more renewable energy, such as solar, helps to make Hawaii less dependent on non-renewable energy sources and, in my opinion, a Greener place to live.


Read more...

West vs China in Solar war

>> Saturday, September 19, 2009

"West vs China in Solar war." Can the West decrease its production costs in in the solar industry by optimizing its processes?


Europe's solar energy industry is facing a wave of bankruptcies because Asian companies offer their products much cheaper. Several German producers of solar cells, panels and modules, including large market-leading companies, have reported massive first-half losses. (Read the article:http://www.upi.com/Science_News/Resource-Wars/2009/09/09/West-vs-China-in-solar-war/UPI-25781252515090/ )

Instead of setting tariff barriers for Made-In China solar cells, why not just reduce 30% of the costs by optimizing the processes? Through Value Stream Analysis and other proven methods, costs can relatively be reduced by up to 20%.

Also, it would be interesting to know if anybody in this group might know about the costs of installing solar panels to feed a whole town as big as Zurich with electricity? How are the costs distributed: how much goes into the actual solar panel costs, and how much actually goes into the installation?
If a town in the size of Zurich uses solar power as its energy source, it is said that its costs are 2.5 times higher than generic energies. Why is that and what can we do to lower those costs? Is process optimization a way to decrease costs for renewable energy solutions?


by Angelina Freshta Farzam (angelina_farzam@yahoo.com)

Read more...